Windows XP Bluescreen (tall)As many of you know, I don’t have a computer. I have an army of computers. I’ve picked them up here and there. I’ve gotten some good deals, inherited them from people who were getting rid of them, and and so on. And I almost never get rid of a computer if it works (and sometimes if it doesn’t) and I am good at keeping computers working. I finally threw away two computers before the cross-country move. I purchased them in 2002. They still worked, but I needed some parts from them. My console has four computers (three operational, one requiring a LiveCD at the moment), soon to be five. I have five laptops in use (one of which with a cracked display), three working ones on stand-by, two semi-functional ones (obscured displays), and two non-functional ones (that, by combining parts, will make a single functional one in the near future).

All but four of them run Windows XP. Which means that this breaks my heart:

On April 8 2014 – exactly 210 days’ time – Microsoft will be putting Windows XP on its ‘end of life’ cycle.

This is not news in itself, yet with pressure ramping up against the near third of users still on the near 13-year-old desktop OS, the clock is ticking for enterprises unwilling to change.

Microsoft has put its cards on the table in this respect. A blog post last month from director Tim Rains warned against the very real dangers of carrying on with XP after support has ceased.

“The very first month that Microsoft releases security updates for supported versions of Windows, attackers will reverse engineer those updates, find the vulnerabilities and test Windows XP to see if it shares those vulnerabilities,” Rains explained, adding: “If it does, attackers will attempt to develop exploit code that can take advantage of those vulnerabilities on Windows XP.”

In case you think this is a marketing ploy to get you to buy new computers, this is a serious security threat. I will not be booting up a networked computer after that date. Which, given my army of computers, presents me with a serious problem. A lot of these computers are not worth what a Windows 7 or Windows 8 license would cost. And that’s if these computers can run Windows 7, which will be a challenge. I have access to Windows Vista licenses for very, very cheap.

Which I guess means that I am about to embark on a Linux the likes of which I never have before. One of the laptops already runs Linux. It’s a computer with good specs that never really lived up to them. A couple of component upgrades helped, but it still struggles. Which could mean that even getting Linux to run on some of these computers may require some tweaking. But my recent experiences have been encouraging that Linux will be the option for many of them.

Some of them are going to be a challenge, though. Mostly because they are specific-use computers. Two, for instance, are attached to television sets. All of my attempts at MythTV have failed. Which isn’t to say that it can’t be done, but it’s going to take some work. Another is on printer duty. Two of its primary jobs are printer-sharing and image manipulation. I haven’t figure out how to share Linux on a primarily Windows network, and I can’t use some of my imaging software on Linux. (Of the three I use – Photoshop,, and GIMP, only the last is available on Linux.) One of the primary functions of one of the desktops involves audio and video conversion, which I have specific Windows software for.

So for some of them, I may have to install Vista or upgrade to Windows 7 or 8 (let’s assume 7). And I’ll have to decide whether to install the 32-bit version of Vista or 7, or the more resource-intensive 64-bit*. For the others, it’s created something of an identity crisis for them. Namely, what are they for? These are questions I have not had to ask myself in a while. Typically they sit, gathering dust, right up until I need them for something. Next time I need them, I may or may not be able to use them depending on what OS they have installed.

Not that I can blame Microsoft for this. They gave it their best:

Here’s a fun fact: XP first appeared at the end of 2001. As late as 2010, computers were still sold with XP installed. Windows Vista, which arrived 6 years after XP, only lasted until 2011.
If you think about it, XP will be nearly 13 years old. Like a teenager, it’s having trouble adjusting to the world. In spite of a major overhaul with Service Pack 3, XP just wasn’t built for the modern digital age.

It’s missing key security features introduced in Windows Vista. It can’t support the latest, safest and most Web-compatible versions of Internet Explorer. It can’t take full advantage of the latest hardware advances.

It’s becoming increasingly frustrating for customers and third-party companies. Many third-party companies would love to stop supporting XP. It takes a lot of time and money to make sure programs and hardware work on every version of Windows.

Windows XP is on so many computers because it was such a long-standing, and happy-for-me, operating system. That I am having this problem so many years later is a testament to how valuable it was. Rest in Peace, XP.

* – The rub being with 32-bit, it will only recognize 3GB of RAM. With 64-bit, I will be able to use between four and eight depending on the machine and whether or not I choose to upgrade. I don’t know whether 32-bit Win7 on 3GB of RAM or 64-bit Win7 on 4GB will actually work better.

Category: Server Room

About the Author

13 Responses to The End of Windows XP

  1. Φ says:

    Question: I have a couple of installation disks for XP, but I think they’re SP1 and SP2, not SP3. Which means that when I install them (which I haven’t done in a while; this is mostly hypothetical), I have to visit Windows Update to make sure all the current patches are installed. Is there a way to get all the current (final) updates stored downloaded onto CDs so I can install them when Windows Update won’t do it anymore?

  2. mike shupp says:

    Oh very very likely there’ll be Win XP fansites for the next dozen years where support packs can be downloaded — Win 98 and Win 2K still have their enthusiasts out there, so why not? Also, if you’re using Norton or Acira or just about any other antivirus software, odds are updates will go on being released for those programs even if MS has officially given up on XP.

    Other hand, is XP all that great? Just what apps/games run on it that don’t run on Vista or Win 7?

    • trumwill says:

      It’s not so much “what apps run it?” as it is “What computers does it run on (and with what performance)? The system requirement differential between XP and 7 is huge.

  3. mike shupp says:

    Well, yeah, hardware changes. I ran Win 98 and Win 2K on one machine from about 2001 till the cpu croaked on me back around 2009. And when I put together my next machine, with a 64-bit Athlon quad processor, going to Win Vista (and then to Win 7, and later yet to Win 8) just seemed the natural progression.

    So my experience hasn’t been yours. That said, if I were in your shoes, I’d go on running Win XP on older machines which are already running it. Do good backups, with Norton Ghost or something similar, so if malware or other evilness strikes, you can undo the damage in twenty minutes or so. Maybe be a little hesitant about downloading stuff using IE8 from sites that give you a creepy feeling.

    Yadda yadda yadda — you know the drill. If Win XP works with the software you’re already running, why bother to change anything? Sure, there are new bells and whistles with later operating systems running on newer machines, and the downloads will go faster and some games that lock up on XP will suddenly run smoother on your 26-core Intel processor running at 17 GHz with 94 HB of cache and 4-slot Nvidia sound card and 90 inch wide monitor, and all the rest of that good stuff. But it doesn’t hurt (not too badly anyhow) to not rush into New Stuff all at once. Remember, while you’re mulling over the utility of that 90″ monitor, the Samsung people are already pouring plastic for the 120″ monitors that are coming out next year.

    • trumwill says:

      The computers in question actually have little vulnerable data on them. My primary concern isn’t that they will wreck the machine(s), but that they’ll zeus my bank account.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

If you are interested in subscribing to new post notifications,
please enter your email address on this page.