The problem-solving skills of 30 Ph.D. scientists were compared to those of 15 conservative Protestant ministers. Of particular interest was the frequency with which these groups generated confirmatory (rather than disconfirmatory)experiments to test their hypotheses. Experimental results showed that—contrary to a popular assumption—the reasoning skills of the scientists were not significantly different from those of nonscientists. In this study, the ministers showed a longer latency to speculation and generated more experiments per hypothesis than did the scientists. These findings are discussed in terms of the psychology of the scientist.

Source: Psychology of the scientist: An analysis of problem-solving bias | SpringerLink

Category: Espresso

About the Author

One Response to Famous Study: Psychology of the scientist – An analysis of problem-solving bias

  1. Oscar Gordon says:

    Being trained in science does not grant one super human reasoning skills. A scientist may have more practice at it, but that says more about the person than the profession.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

If you are interested in subscribing to new post notifications,
please enter your email address on this page.